Subversion Repositories HelenOS-doc

Rev

Rev 33 | Rev 42 | Go to most recent revision | Blame | Compare with Previous | Last modification | View Log | Download | RSS feed

  1. \chapter{Project}
  2. \label{project}
  3.  
  4. The HelenOS project was formed in late October 2004, when the six
  5. developers grouped and decided to adopt previous work of {\JJ} on the
  6. SPARTAN kernel\footnote{The SPARTAN kernel has been developed by {\JJ}
  7. since 2001.} as a foundation for their new operating system.
  8.  
  9. The team had then worked on a specification\cite{helenos-spec} until
  10. March 8, 2005. The specification was based on \MD's draft and
  11. incorporated many suggestions from other members of the team. The
  12. biggest part of the discussion was concerned about how many and what
  13. processor architectures we will support. At that time, the SPARTAN
  14. kernel supported ia32 and mips32 to the extent that kernel threads could
  15. be scheduled. The ia32 port could do some very basic virtual memory
  16. operations and was capable of SMP service. Moreover, the mips32 port ran
  17. only in the msim simulator. None of them supported userspace threads.
  18.  
  19. We realized the need to support at least one 64-bit architecture and
  20. have long discussed whether it should be amd64 or ia64. We also considered
  21. ppc64. At the end, we decided to declare support for three new architectures,
  22. five architectures in total. Both amd64 and ia64 made it to the specifications,
  23. as well as PowerPC. As for PowerPC, the specification didn't say whether ppc32
  24. or ppc64 or both will be supported.\footnote{This has later proven a bit problematic
  25. because it is not very clear what ppc32 should be (i.e. the 32-bit G4 processor is not
  26. compatible with the 32-bit mode of the G5 processor.}
  27.  
  28. It is worth noting that we wanted to be sure of access to respective hardware
  29. or at least simulator, prior to committing to support particular architecture.
  30. The decision to support almost all suggested architectures\footnote{Namely, we didn't declare
  31. support for sparc64, but it got supported anyway as part of \JJ's master thesis.} came after
  32. we had known for sure the above condition was satisfied.
  33.  
  34. We constructed our specification so that it contained a well defined
  35. set of mandatory features of the kernel and the userspace layer
  36. that had to be implemented. Besides the mandatory features, there
  37. was also an optional part comprising of three research or experimental
  38. topics. We hoped to eventually find time to work on them.
  39.  
  40. After adopting our specification, we started to meet regularily every two weeks
  41. for the sake of consultations. The regular meetings were cancelled only during
  42. the exam periods and summer holiday. The first meeting took place on April 28,
  43. April. There had been twenty project meetings before 1.0.0 release.
  44.  
  45. The Faculty of Mathematics and Physics officially opened our project on June 10,
  46. 2005.
  47.  
  48.