Subversion Repositories HelenOS-doc

<chapter id="scheduling">

  <?dbhtml filename="scheduling.html"?>

  <title>Scheduling</title>

  <para>One of the key aims of the operating system is to create and support

  the impression that several activities are executing contemporarily. This is

  true for both uniprocessor as well as multiprocessor systems. In the case of

  multiprocessor systems, the activities are trully happening in parallel. The

  many processors as possible and, where this means reaches its limits, by

  quickly switching among threads executing on a single processor.</para>

  <section>

    <para>The term context refers to the set of processor resources that

    define the current state of the computation or the environment and the

    kernel understands it in several more or less narrow sences:</para>

    <itemizedlist>

      <listitem>

        <para>synchronous register context,</para>

      </listitem>

        <para>asynchronous register context,</para>

      </listitem>

      <listitem>

        <para>FPU context and</para>

        <para>memory management context.</para>

      </listitem>

    </itemizedlist>

    <para>The most narrow sence refers to the the synchronous register

    context. It includes all the preserved registers as defined by the

    architecture. To highlight some, the program counter and stack pointer

    take part in the synchronous register context. These are the registers

    that must be preserved across a procedure call and during synchronous

    context switches. </para>

    <para>The next type of the context understood by the kernel is the

    asynchronous register context. On an interrupt, the interrupted execution

    flow's state must be guaranteed to be eventually completely restored.

    Therefore the interrupt context includes, among other things, the scratch

    registers as defined by the architecture. As a special optimization and if

    certain conditions are met, it need not include the architecture's

    preserved registers. The condition mentioned in the previous sentence is

    that the low-level assembly language interrupt routines don't modify the

    preserved registers. The handlers usually call a higher-level C routine.

    The preserved registers are then saved on the stack by the compiler

    generated code of the higher-level function. In HelenOS, several

    architectures can be compiled with this optimization.</para>

    <para>Although the kernel does not do any floating point

    arithmetics<footnote>

        <para>Some architectures (e.g. ia64) inevitably use a fixed set of

        floating point registers to carry out its normal operations.</para>

      </footnote>, it must protect FPU context of userspace threads against

    destruction by other threads. Moreover, only a fraction of userspace

    programs use the floating point unit. HelenOS contains a generic framework

    for switching FPU context only when the switch is forced.</para>

    <para>The last member of the context family is the memory management

    context. It includes memory management registers that identify address

    spaces on hardware level (i.e. ASIDs and page tables pointers).</para>

      <para>The scheduler, but also other pieces of the kernel, make heavy use

      of synchronous context switches, because it is a natural vehicle not

      only for changes in control flow, but also for switching between two

      kernel stacks. Two functions figure in a synchronous context switch

      implementation: <code>context_save</code> and

      <code>context_restore</code>. Note that these two functions break the

      natural perception of the linear C code execution flow starting at

      function's entry point and ending on one of the function's exit

      points.</para>

      synchronous context is saved in a memory structure passed to it. After

      executing <code>context_save</code>, the caller is returned 1 as a

      return value. The execution of instructions continues as normally until

      <code>context_restore</code> is called. For the caller, it seems like

      the call never returns<footnote>

          <para>Which might be a source of problems with variable liveliness

          after <code>context_restore</code>.</para>

        </footnote>. Nevertheless, a synchronous register context, which is

      saved in a memory structure passed to <code>context_restore,</code> is

      restored, thus transfering the control flow to the place of occurrence

      of the corresponding call to <code>context_save</code>. From the

      perspective of the caller of the corresponding

      <code>context_save</code>, it looks as though a return from

      <code>context_save</code>. However, this time a return value of 0 is

      returned.</para>

  </section>

    <para>How scheduler designed and how it works.</para>

  </section>