206,35 → 206,35 |
|
rc = _mutex_lock_timeout(&rwl->exclusive, usec, flags); |
switch (rc) { |
case ESYNCH_WOULD_BLOCK: |
/* |
* release_spinlock() wasn't called |
*/ |
thread_register_call_me(NULL, NULL); |
spinlock_unlock(&rwl->lock); |
case ESYNCH_TIMEOUT: |
case ESYNCH_INTERRUPTED: |
/* |
* The sleep timed out. |
* We just restore interrupt priority level. |
*/ |
case ESYNCH_OK_BLOCKED: |
/* |
* We were woken with rwl->readers_in already incremented. |
* Note that this arrangement avoids race condition between |
* two concurrent readers. (Race is avoided if 'exclusive' is |
* locked at the same time as 'readers_in' is incremented. |
* Same time means both events happen atomically when |
* rwl->lock is held.) |
*/ |
interrupts_restore(ipl); |
break; |
case ESYNCH_OK_ATOMIC: |
panic("_mutex_lock_timeout()==ESYNCH_OK_ATOMIC\n"); |
break; |
default: |
panic("invalid ESYNCH\n"); |
break; |
case ESYNCH_WOULD_BLOCK: |
/* |
* release_spinlock() wasn't called |
*/ |
thread_register_call_me(NULL, NULL); |
spinlock_unlock(&rwl->lock); |
case ESYNCH_TIMEOUT: |
case ESYNCH_INTERRUPTED: |
/* |
* The sleep timed out. |
* We just restore interrupt priority level. |
*/ |
case ESYNCH_OK_BLOCKED: |
/* |
* We were woken with rwl->readers_in already incremented. |
* Note that this arrangement avoids race condition between |
* two concurrent readers. (Race is avoided if 'exclusive' is |
* locked at the same time as 'readers_in' is incremented. |
* Same time means both events happen atomically when |
* rwl->lock is held.) |
*/ |
interrupts_restore(ipl); |
break; |
case ESYNCH_OK_ATOMIC: |
panic("_mutex_lock_timeout()==ESYNCH_OK_ATOMIC\n"); |
break; |
default: |
panic("invalid ESYNCH\n"); |
break; |
} |
return rc; |
} |